I came across another business the other day that had decided on an even ownership structure with a 50/50 equity split between two Founders.
2 shares issued in a company structure, with each Director each holding one share.
Great in theory, with undertones of, "let's get after this thing together..", but comes with inherent flaws and risks.
The Directors had drifted apart, and now had different priorities, different appetities for risk, different goals, and different levels of commitment to the entity they'd founded together.
The resulting stalemate is not pretty.
Neither wants to sell their equity to the other, and neither can make any operational or financial decisions without the other's approval.
In effect, the entity is now paralysed and dying.
Whilst not an accountant or financial adviser, when I'm engaged to help an entity get up and running with more than one Founder involved, I always recommend that there be a controlling party who can ultimately make a decision, and that 'even-equity' splits carry risks, including those detailed above.
Often, having an initial discussion about who will hold a controlling share brings to light issues that will arise later.
It's better to bring these preferences and aspirations to the table during initial discussions, before debt, employees, risk, and significant financials are involved.
Founding or owning a business by yourself can be a lonely, intimidating, overwhelming place, so having someone come on that journey with you can be great - just think through the structure you choose.
Cheers, Garrick
https://www.garrickjackson.com
